About · Reviewing Committee

Reviewing Committee.

A double-blind peer-review process by an independent expert. Reviewers are guided by objectivity, confidentiality, and the merit of the manuscript alone.

Double-blind peer review32 reviewers

All submitted papers received by the editorial office are firstly checked by the editors to determine if they are properly prepared and follow the ethical policies of the conference. The editors are responsible for deciding which of the submitted papers should be published, guided by the policies of the conference editorial team and constrained by such legal requirements as copyright infringement and plagiarism.

Once a paper passes the editorial checks, it will be assigned to an independent expert for a double-blind peer-review. Judgements should be objective, reviewers should have no conflict of interest and should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited. Reviewed articles should be treated confidentially.

The editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
i.

Possible reviewer recommendations

Reviewers evaluate the paper using the review form and may recommend one of five outcomes.

Accept in current form

The paper is ready for publication as submitted.

Accept with minor correction

Minor textual or formatting fixes; no further re-review needed.

Accept with major corrections

Substantive revisions required before publication.

Accept only after corrections and repeated review

Revisions required, then a second reviewer round to confirm.

Reject the paper

The submission does not meet the standards of the conference proceedings.

The final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will also be sent to the corresponding author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers. The editors' decision should be based only on the importance of the paper, its originality and clarity, and the relevance of the study to the aim of the conference.

ii.

Reviewing committee

32 members

Showing all reviewers

prof. Ing. Jaroslav BELAS, PhD.

Tomas Bata University in Zlin

Czech Republic

Dr. Martin CEPEL

Pan-European University in Bratislava

Slovak Republic

Dr.h.c. prof. Ing. Tatiana COREJOVA, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

Jerome DEGGANS, PhD.

The Sharing Economy Platforms Laboratory, Montreal

USA

assoc. prof. Ing. Viktor V. DENGOV, PhD.

State University in St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

prof. Rayna DIMITROVA, PhD.

South-West University Neofit Rilski

Bulgaria

Dr. Sheshadri Chatterjee

Indian Institute of Information Technology Lucknow

India

assoc. prof. Ing. Pavol DURANA, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

prof. Ing. Valentina V. GERASIMENKO, PhD.

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Russian Federation

Johanna GRUDIN, PhD.

The Smart Economy Laboratory, North Carolina

USA

assoc. prof. Ing. Ales HES, CSc.

University of Finance and Administration, Praha

Czech Republic

Dr. Anita KOLNHOFER-DERECSKEI

Obuda University, Budapest

Hungary

prof. Maria KICHEVA, PhD.

South-West University Neofit Rilski

Bulgaria

prof. Ing. Tomas KLIESTIK, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

prof. Ing. Pavol KRAL, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

assoc. prof. Ing. Maria KOVACOVA, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

prof. Ing. Anna KRIZANOVA, CSc.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

assoc. prof. Gheorghe LAZAROIU, PhD.

Spiru Haret University, Bucharest

Romania

prof. Ing. Alexander N. LYAKIN, DrSc.

State University in St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

prof. Ing. Olga P. MOLCHANOVA, PhD.

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Russian Federation

prof. Ing. Hussam MUSA, PhD.

Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica

Slovak Republic

prof. Ing. Zdenka MUSOVA, PhD.

Matej Bel University, Banska Bystrica

Slovak Republic

prof. univ. dr. Elvira NICA

Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Romania

assoc. prof. Judit OLAH, PhD.

University of Debrecen

Hungary

prof. Gheorghe H. POPESCU, PhD.

Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University, Bucharest

Romania

prof. Ruxandra Irina POPESCU, PhD.

Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Romania

Ana Madalina POTCOVARU, PhD.

Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Romania

prof. Dr. Jozsef POPP, PhD.

Szent Istvan University

Hungary

Oana Matilda SABIE, PhD.

Bucharest University of Economic Studies

Romania

Dr. phil., prof. Velga VEVERE

The University College of Economics and Culture

Latvia

assoc. prof. Ing. Katarína VALASKOVA, PhD.

University of Žilina

Slovak Republic

prof. Ing. Natalia A. ZHURAVLEVA, PhD.

Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University

Russian Federation